New Early Literacy Bill AB 1454 Moves Forward!

The compromise bill passed unanimously in the Assembly Education Committee on April 30th.

After several weeks of negotiations, AB 1454 (Rivas) has been amended to reflect a consensus between literacy bills AB 1121 (Rubio) and AB 1194 (Muratsuchi). While the compromise bill doesn’t include everything we had hoped for, we feel it is a huge step forward for literacy in our state. DDCA thanks Speaker Robert Rivas, Assemblywoman Blanca E. Rubio, and Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi for collaborating to co-author AB 1454. 

In summary, AB 1454:

  • Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to identify and post on its website a list of inservice professional development programs for effective literacy instruction for training certificated and classified staff who provide reading instruction, or who support any teacher who provides reading instruction in transitional kindergarten through 5th grade;
  • Requires the CDE, contingent upon appropriation, to apportion funds to Local Education Agencies for professional development using one of the identified programs;
  • Requires the State Board of Education to conduct a follow-up instructional materials adoption for English language arts and English language development;
  • Requires professional development and instructional materials to include the requirements in current law regarding evidence-based means of teaching foundational reading skills in print concepts, phonological awareness, phonics and word recognition, and fluency to all pupils, including tiered supports for pupils with reading difficulties, English learners, and pupils with exceptional needs;
  • Requires the professional development and instructional materials to be aligned to the Commission on Teacher Credentialing’s (CTC) teaching performance expectations, the English Language Arts/English Language Development Framework, and the California Dyslexia Guidelines;
  • Requires the CTC to ensure that the program standards for the professional preparation of candidates for an administrative services credential include preparation on how to support teachers in delivering instruction through effective means for teaching literacy. 

Details can be found in the AB 1454 Bill Analysis and you can watch the hearing at this link (AB 1454 begins around the 2:10 mark). We thank the over 50 advocates who traveled from across the state to attend the rally, hearing, and mini-lobby day. It was an inspirational day!

What’s the story of AB 1454?

The weeks approaching the April 30th hearing were almost a repeat of the year prior, when AB 2222, the comprehensive early literacy bill co-sponsored by DDCA in 2024, was not scheduled for a hearing. Following opposition from California Teachers Association and Californians Together, Speaker Robert Rivas asked the AB 2222 sponsors to return in 2025 after working with opposing groups.

A new version of the bill, AB 1121 (Rubio), was introduced in February 2025. In the days leading up to the deadline, negotiations between lawmakers, the bill co-sponsors DDCA, EdVoice, Families In Schools, the NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference, and several opposing groups intensified until a compromise was reached hours before the deadline. 

Assemblywoman Blanca Rubio, the author of AB 1121, said at the hearing that negotiating the compromise was “by far, the hardest thing that I have ever done in nine years as a legislator.” 

The next hearing for AB 1454, before the Assembly Appropriations Committee, will be scheduled in the coming weeks. We are now focused on making sure this bill is adequately funded!

Why is this bill important?

As parents of dyslexic children and professionals who work with struggling readers, we know the solution to reading failure is teachers equipped with the tools necessary to deliver evidence-based instruction. Beginning in the 2025-26 school year, as a result of the new universal screening law, which DDCA worked towards for many years, all kindergarten through grade 2 students will be screened annually for risk of reading difficulties. Now that students will be identified as showing signs of struggle in the early grades, teachers need to be prepared to support students’ needs. AB 1454 addresses this knowledge gap. 

Since we got started thirteen years ago, DDCA has been laser-focused on improving reading outcomes for California’s millions of public school students, especially for the approximately 930,000 students with dyslexia. Students with dyslexia are uniquely susceptible to poor instruction and experience the effects of poor instruction the most profoundly, with severe consequences. AB 1454 aims to improve access to evidence-based instruction delivered by well-prepared teachers, which benefits all students and is critical to the success of students with dyslexia.

AB 1454 has the potential to uplift reading outcomes for millions of California students. Join us to see it through the next steps, and all the way to its success!

The Question Remains: Will CA Teacher Prep Programs Be Held Accountable for Meeting the New Literacy Standards?

On April 19th, the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing voted unanimously to reaffirm Mills College at Northeastern’s (MC:NU) accreditation despite a complaint filed jointly by Decoding Dyslexia CA, Families in Schools, and the California Reading Coalition. 

Our complaint found the college’s new educator preparation program failed to meet the literacy teaching requirements mandated by Senate Bill 488.

This Complaint Matters
As a result of SB 488, which passed in 2022, California has new and improved literacy standards and expectations for teacher candidates and their preparation programs. DDCA fought very hard over several years for these standards because we know the solution to children’s struggles with reading are teachers who are knowledgeable about the science of reading and evidence-based teaching methods. Our educators deserve to be prepared for the critical job of teaching kids to read. CA kids’ futures depend on it.

The new literacy standards under SB 488 demand that pre-service teachers learn how to screen students for reading difficulties, including risk of dyslexia, as well as implement structured literacy in the classroom. The new literacy standards also require that teacher preparation programs incorporate the California Dyslexia Guidelines so that new teachers are better prepared to meet the needs of students with, or at risk for, dyslexia. 

The above components were not found in the MC:NU course syllabi. Furthermore, their coursework paid insufficient attention to the five components identified by the National Reading Panel as necessary for reading. The MC:NU coursework emphasized typical balanced literacy practices such as guided reading, leveled texts, and running records and also included required course readings by controversial curriculum authors Fountas & Pinnell. The three-cueing method of reading instruction, which was debunked by cognitive science decades ago, was embedded throughout their coursework. Finally, the program didn’t mention how to provide additional help for struggling and multilingual students.

Failing to follow science fails kids!

The MC:NU program is one of the first new teacher preparation programs to apply for accreditation under the new literacy standards. If MC:NU’s program is accredited, this will set a dangerous precedent. The door will be wide open for what is deemed “acceptable” coursework and literacy instructional practices for all other California teacher prep programs. 

The 4/19 Meeting
In addition to nine written public comments, the meeting had many call-in commenters who brought passion and expertise to the topic. We urge you to listen to the voices of those who care deeply about this issue. (To listen to the public comments, please click on the images below.)

The first two audio clips are from Maryanne Wolf and Sue Sears who were two of the literacy experts appointed by the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing to develop the new standards. In their public comments, they each expressed significant concern that MC:NU’s teacher prep program has fallen short of meeting the standard requirements.


“[The new literacy standards] seem to be misunderstood at Mills College at Northeastern. It is unfortunate, but from my opinion after 30 years of intervention work, this fails to meet the standards that you [the Commission] asked us to bring to every teacher so that every teacher could be prepared to teach every child.”

 

“In the case of Mills College, we have three concerns [insufficient coverage of foundational skills, very little attention to reading assessment practices, and the omission of the Multi-Tiered Systems of Support, which are integral to meeting the needs of all California students]. We think the syllabi deserve further examination as does the program.”

 

“We sincerely hope the Committee on Accreditation and the Commission on Teacher Credentialing take into consideration the rigorous requirements institutions of higher ed must meet in order to adequately comply with [the literacy standards].”

 

“My team of analysts reviewed the syllabi provided by Mills College. Based on these documents, had Mills College been part of the sample of programs we reviewed for our [June 2023] report, it would have earned a grade of F for failing to provide adequate coverage of the five core components of reading instruction.”

 

“We are at a critical juncture as the literacy standards will not make a difference if the Commission does not hold our teacher prep programs accountable for complying with them… The [Commission] is required, under law, to ensure that the programs satisfy these new literacy teaching standards.”

 

“Most families simply trust. They trust that people in power, like you, will uphold the law to ensure that their children will have educators equipped to teach their children to read and to help them succeed in school. They trust the system, and so because you are the system, I am here today to ask you to investigate our complaint and ensure the law is followed so that every new teacher can effectively teach every student to read.”

 

“I urge the Commission to take appropriate and immediate action to investigate the complaint filed on the Mills College at Northeastern’s teacher preparation programs. There are fundamental issues at stake here. 2022’s SB 488 put into law specific key requirements for preparing new teachers to teach reading aligned with the best current evidence. Our young students deserve this evidence-based instruction and our new teachers deserve to be prepared. [Mills College at Northeastern] falls well short on meeting those requirements.”

 

“Running records, guided reading and three-cueing failed me as a teacher and failed my students who deserved instruction grounded in science… My story is not at all unique. Thousands of teachers are currently seeking knowledge counter to the balanced literacy methods they learned in their teacher prep [programs]. Please use your authority to enforce California’s standards for teacher preparation.”

Next Steps
The Commission voted unanimously to send the complaint back to the Committee on Accreditation (COA) for reconsideration. The COA is the body established in state statute to review programs and make final program accreditation decisions.

At the June 6-7 COA meeting, they will vote on whether to reconsider their previous approval of the MC:NU Multiple Subject program based on the complaint. 

While DDCA was disappointed the 4/19 meeting did not result in an investigation of the complaint or provide technical assistance, we are heartened that there is a next step. It is now in the hands of the COA to review and determine whether the MC:NU program upholds the new literacy standards. 

The evidence is clear to us that MC:NU is out of compliance with SB 488. We hope the COA uses their authority to uphold the law. 

For the future of 6 million public school children in California, DDCA stands on the side of science.

Read more about the complaint here: Sharp divisions over how California’s aspiring teachers will be taught to teach reading | EdSource

And, please encourage family, friends, and colleagues to sign up for DDCA emails to stay informed on all literacy-related efforts in California.