New Early Literacy Bill AB 1454 Moves Forward!

The compromise bill passed unanimously in the Assembly Education Committee on April 30th.

After several weeks of negotiations, AB 1454 (Rivas) has been amended to reflect a consensus between literacy bills AB 1121 (Rubio) and AB 1194 (Muratsuchi). While the compromise bill doesn’t include everything we had hoped for, we feel it is a huge step forward for literacy in our state. DDCA thanks Speaker Robert Rivas, Assemblywoman Blanca E. Rubio, and Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi for collaborating to co-author AB 1454. 

In summary, AB 1454:

  • Requires the California Department of Education (CDE) to identify and post on its website a list of inservice professional development programs for effective literacy instruction for training certificated and classified staff who provide reading instruction, or who support any teacher who provides reading instruction in transitional kindergarten through 5th grade;
  • Requires the CDE, contingent upon appropriation, to apportion funds to Local Education Agencies for professional development using one of the identified programs;
  • Requires the State Board of Education to conduct a follow-up instructional materials adoption for English language arts and English language development;
  • Requires professional development and instructional materials to include the requirements in current law regarding evidence-based means of teaching foundational reading skills in print concepts, phonological awareness, phonics and word recognition, and fluency to all pupils, including tiered supports for pupils with reading difficulties, English learners, and pupils with exceptional needs;
  • Requires the professional development and instructional materials to be aligned to the Commission on Teacher Credentialing’s (CTC) teaching performance expectations, the English Language Arts/English Language Development Framework, and the California Dyslexia Guidelines;
  • Requires the CTC to ensure that the program standards for the professional preparation of candidates for an administrative services credential include preparation on how to support teachers in delivering instruction through effective means for teaching literacy. 

Details can be found in the AB 1454 Bill Analysis and you can watch the hearing at this link (AB 1454 begins around the 2:10 mark). We thank the over 50 advocates who traveled from across the state to attend the rally, hearing, and mini-lobby day. It was an inspirational day!

What’s the story of AB 1454?

The weeks approaching the April 30th hearing were almost a repeat of the year prior, when AB 2222, the comprehensive early literacy bill co-sponsored by DDCA in 2024, was not scheduled for a hearing. Following opposition from California Teachers Association and Californians Together, Speaker Robert Rivas asked the AB 2222 sponsors to return in 2025 after working with opposing groups.

A new version of the bill, AB 1121 (Rubio), was introduced in February 2025. In the days leading up to the deadline, negotiations between lawmakers, the bill co-sponsors DDCA, EdVoice, Families In Schools, the NAACP California-Hawaii State Conference, and several opposing groups intensified until a compromise was reached hours before the deadline. 

Assemblywoman Blanca Rubio, the author of AB 1121, said at the hearing that negotiating the compromise was “by far, the hardest thing that I have ever done in nine years as a legislator.” 

The next hearing for AB 1454, before the Assembly Appropriations Committee, will be scheduled in the coming weeks. We are now focused on making sure this bill is adequately funded!

Why is this bill important?

As parents of dyslexic children and professionals who work with struggling readers, we know the solution to reading failure is teachers equipped with the tools necessary to deliver evidence-based instruction. Beginning in the 2025-26 school year, as a result of the new universal screening law, which DDCA worked towards for many years, all kindergarten through grade 2 students will be screened annually for risk of reading difficulties. Now that students will be identified as showing signs of struggle in the early grades, teachers need to be prepared to support students’ needs. AB 1454 addresses this knowledge gap. 

Since we got started thirteen years ago, DDCA has been laser-focused on improving reading outcomes for California’s millions of public school students, especially for the approximately 930,000 students with dyslexia. Students with dyslexia are uniquely susceptible to poor instruction and experience the effects of poor instruction the most profoundly, with severe consequences. AB 1454 aims to improve access to evidence-based instruction delivered by well-prepared teachers, which benefits all students and is critical to the success of students with dyslexia.

AB 1454 has the potential to uplift reading outcomes for millions of California students. Join us to see it through the next steps, and all the way to its success!

A California Perspective on Calkins’ Teachers College Reading & Writing Project Upheaval

A lot has transpired since our most recent blog was published on September 14, Columbia Dissolves TCRWP & Lucy Calkins Steps Down.” Several other media sources have published articles, including:

What will the impact be, if any, in California?

Well, that remains to be seen. Even before the latest round of news from Columbia Teachers College, Decoding Dyslexia CA was seeing some movement away from Calkins’ popular curriculum, the Units of Study in Reading, as some districts began aligning with the Science of Reading amid a statewide literacy crisis that has California lagging the nation in fourth-grade reading proficiency.

Units of Study in Reading refers to the wildly popular instructional materials authored by Lucy Calkins and Teachers College Reading Writing Project (TCRWP). For decades Lucy Calkins and TCRWP hosted professional development on the Ivy League campus of Columbia Teachers College that aligned with the commercial curriculum products. While the affiliation between TCRWP and the university is ending, the Units of Study curriculum will continue to be published by Heinemann. This blog focuses on districts’ movement away from using the Heinemann-published Units of Study in Reading curriculum.

Palo Alto Unified School District

One example is the Palo Alto Unified School District. PAUSD has undertaken several district changes as part of its Every Students Reads Initiative. One of these was to abandon Calkins’ Units of Study in Reading and adopt a new core ELA/ELD curriculum in addition to implementing universal screening, teacher training, and coaching, among other things.

Source: EdSource “How our district moved the needle on early literacy (and you can too)

You can learn more about Palo Alto Unified School District’s initiative here:

Palo Alto’s investment in structured literacy is showing results with significant gains in the CAASPP results for their Low-income Latino 3rd Graders, as shown below.

Source: EdSource “How our district moved the needle on early literacy (and you can too)

Berkeley Unified School District

Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD), another Lucy Calkins’ Units of Study district, has had to implement a districtwide literacy improvement plan that includes screening all K-5 students for reading difficulties and implementing evidence-based literacy interventions as the result of a federal class action lawsuit settlement in 2021. 

The district must also evaluate the effectiveness of its Tier 1 curriculum. In March of 2023, BUSD began its own curriculum audit. According to the Berkeley Unified School District Literacy Action Plan 2022-2023 – Fourth Quarter Report (dated August 23, 2023), the “results of the review indicate gaps in key areas of literacy instruction in the TCRWP – Units of Study curriculum.” The details of the BUSD review can be found in Appendix B, pages 20-22, and the deficiencies are wide-ranging. What remains to be seen is if BUSD will abandon Units of Study instead of continuing to try and prop it up with “band-aid phonics patches”…but more about that later.

San Francisco Unified School District

San Francisco Unified is not as far along but has already made significant commitments to changing its reading instruction. Based on findings of an external curriculum and instruction audit, the district will replace Lucy Calkins’ curriculum. The audit of SFUSD’s literacy program found that over 90% of observed instruction in SFUSD classrooms did not incorporate sufficient opportunities for students to practice foundational reading skills. This comes as no surprise as the consensus from reviews and ratings is clear: Units of Study in Reading fails to provide the systematic and explicit instruction in foundational skills necessary for the majority of children to learn to read. Reviewers have also noted weaknesses in areas of vocabulary and knowledge building and other things, but poor guidance on foundational skills is the most glaring.

Source: K-5 Literacy Program Review: San Francisco Unified School District

West Contra Costa Unified School District

In West Contra Costa Unified School District (WCCUSD), despite reading scores being “stagnant for over a decade” and a less-than-ambitious district reading goal to “improve by 5% each year,” WCCUSD will shockingly stick with Calkins’ Units of Study in Reading according to EdSource articleWest Contra Costa superintendent seeks to raise reading scores.”

Source: EdSource “How our district moved the needle on early literacy (and you can too)

In our last blog, DDCA referenced a 2020 report done by nationally-renowned experts entitled Comparing Reading Research to Program Design: An Examination of Teachers College Units of Study” which found, in addition to overall flaws in Calkins program, specifically noted that English Learners “will not have access to best practices in literacy instruction, particularly in the beginning and early stages of literacy development. Claims made in the Units about practices that are “especially powerful” or “incredibly supportive” for English language learners are not consistent with existing research.”

According to the EdSource article, WCCUSD is planning on adding a “band-aid” patch to shore up its failing Units of Study curricula.

How Widespread is the Calkins TCRWP curriculum?

It is very difficult to find out how pervasive the use of Calkins’ curriculum is in our California school districts. Are Calkins’ Units of Study on the state-adopted list of approved English Language Arts curriculum? No. Are school districts able to adopt curricula not on the state-adopted list? Yes.

Two interesting reports were issued by the California Reading Coalition. One (the California Reading Report Card 2022 ranked districts by the percent of economically disadvantaged Hispanic/Latino (Latino) students who “meet or exceed” grade level for the CAASPP 3rd grade ELA test in 2022. In California, economically disadvantaged Latino students make up 43% of California K-12 enrollment. The other report, the California Reading Curriculum Report, found that districts using Units of Study were disproportionately among the lowest-performing in the state overall.

Source: CA Reading Coalition’s Curriculum Report

Despite the fact that Calkins’ Units of Study are not on the state-adopted curriculum list, the CA State Board of Education (SBE) held out this curriculum as an exemplary program in a federal literacy grant application. In an EdWeek article entitled “Advocates for Science-Based Reading Instruction Worry California Plan Sends the Wrong Message,” advocates, including Decoding Dyslexia CA, called out SBE for naming Calkins’ curriculum as an exemplary program “proven to improve student outcomes,” when in fact there is minimal evidence of its effectiveness. SBE also added a footnote with a website link to the commercial Units of Study program in its federal grant application. 

Interested in Learning More?

If you are interested in learning more about California’s long history of failed whole language and “balanced literacy” programs, such as Calkins’ Units of Study in Reading, take the time to listen to or read:

Stay tuned for our next blog on why adding “band-aid phonics patches” to Calkins’ Units of Study does more harm than good.

And as always, please encourage family, friends, and colleagues to sign up for DDCA emails to stay informed on dyslexia-related efforts in California.